Moral responsibility and the metaphysics of free will: Reply to Van Inwagen

Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191):215-220 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In _The Philosophical Quarterly, 47 (1997), pp. 373-381, van Inwagen argues in a critical notice of my book _The Metaphysics of Free Will that the impression that Frankfurt-type examples show that moral responsibility need not require alternative possibilities results from insufficient analytical precision. He suggests various precise principles which imply that moral responsibility requires alternative possibilities. In reply, I seek to defend the conclusion I have drawn from Frankfurt-type examples: moral responsibility need not require alternative possibilities. I contend that van Inwagen's principle the principle of possible prevention and the no-matter-what principle are invalid, and I suggest that their plausibility comes from thinking about a proper subset of the relevant cases

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
302 (#91,826)

6 months
5 (#1,059,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Fischer
University of California, Riverside

Citations of this work

Reasons reactivity and incompatibilist intuitions.Michael McKenna - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (2):131-143.
Indeterminism and Frankfurt‐type examples.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (1):42-58.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The inevitable.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1992 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (4):388 – 404.
Fischer on Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW]Peter Inwagen - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (188):373 - 381.

Add more references