Evidence of evidence is not (necessarily) evidence

Analysis 72 (1):85-88 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this note, I consider various precisifications of the slogan ‘evidence of evidence is evidence’. I provide counter-examples to each of these precisifications (assuming an epistemic probabilistic relevance notion of ‘evidential support’)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-06

Downloads
715 (#35,138)

6 months
13 (#253,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Branden Fitelson
Northeastern University

Citations of this work

Suspending is Believing.Thomas Raleigh - 2019 - Synthese (3):1-26.
Reasons and Theoretical Rationality.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Higher-Order Evidence.Daniel Whiting - 2020 - Analysis 80 (4):789-807.
When Expert Disagreement Supports the Consensus.Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):142-156.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Mental causation.Stephen Yablo - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):245-280.
Having evidence.Richard Feldman - 1988 - In D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 83--104.
Confirmation and relevance.Wesley C. Salmon - 1983 - In Peter Achinstein (ed.), The concept of evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Can Counterfactuals Solve the Exclusion Problem?Lei Zhong - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1):129-147.

Add more references