Possible world semantics for first order lp

Abstract

First we have individual variables, as usual in first-order logics. (We do not have individual constants, but this is a minor point.) The propositional logic LP has justification constants, but in FOLP these are generalized to allow individual variables as arguments. Thus we have as justification constants c, c(x), c(x, y), . . . . Similarly LP has justification variables, but in FOLP these can be parametrized with individual variables p, p(x), p(x, y), . . . . To keep terminology in line with past papers, we will still refer to things as justification constants and justification variables, even though they have structure to them. As in LP, justification terms are built up from justification constants and justification variables using ·, +, ! as usual. In addition there is a new constructor, genx, introduced by Artemov, and there is one further new constructor, exsx, introduced in this paper. If t is a justification term and x is an individual variable, genxt and exsxt are justification terms. An individual variable x is free in a justification term unless it is bound by genx or exsx. More specifically, the free variables of p(x, y, . . .) and of c(x, y, . . .) are {x, y, . . .}, the free variables of s · t and of s + t are the free variables of s together with the free variables of t, the free variables of !s are the free variables of s, and the free variables of genxt and of exsxt are the free variables of t except for x. Formulas are built up from atomic formulas, including ⊥, in the way standard in first-order logic, together with the additional formation rule: t:X is a formula provided t is a justification term, X is a formula, and all free variables of X occur in t. We assume ⊃, ⊥, and ∀ are basic, with other connectives and quantifier defined. The axiomatization used here is a combination of an LP axiomatization and a standard axiomatization of first-order logic, together with a version of the Barcan formula, and one additional axiom that corresponds to the converse Barcan formula..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Dependence and Independence.Erich Grädel & Jouko Väänänen - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (2):399-410.
Remarks on Floyd-Hoare derivability.Laszlo Csirmaz - 1980 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 9 (3):131-133.
Algebraic aspects of deduction theorems.Janusz Czelakowski - 1983 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 12 (3):111-114.
The Antinomy of the Variable: A Tarskian Resolution.Bryan Pickel & Brian Rabern - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (3):137-170.
Quantificational Logic and Empty Names.Andrew Bacon - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13.
A note on the Lambek-van Benthem calculus.Wojciech Buszkowski - 1984 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 13 (1):31-35.
On regular and symmetric identities II.Ewa Graczynska - 1982 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (3/4):100-102.
The topology of justification.Sergei Artemov & Elena Nogina - 2008 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (1-2):59-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-23

Downloads
65 (#324,727)

6 months
65 (#90,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Melvin Fitting
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references