ECMO: What Would a Deliberative Public Judge?

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):46-48 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I fundamentally agree with Childress et al. (2023) in the scenario they have constructed with Mr. J. None of the arguments they critically assess are ethically persuasive enough to justify removing...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Divergence of Technical and Human Teleology.Roxanne E. Kirsch - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):38-41.
Why Deny ECMO-DT to the Incapacitated?Kyle E. Karches - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):70-72.
The Moral Relevance of ECMO Bridge Maintenance.Andrew M. Courtwright - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):52-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-25

Downloads
23 (#931,345)

6 months
4 (#1,238,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leonard M. Fleck
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

The ECMO Bridge and 5 Paths.Arthur R. Derse - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):1-4.

Add more citations