Energy, risks, and metatechnology

Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):89-94 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Technologies lower constraints and expand affordances. As a consequence, they tend to redesign the corresponding space of risks in which agents operate and interact. This paper analyses the concept of metatechnological risk from an ethical perspective, arguing that such an approach is necessary in order to mitigate future global energy crises.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

On the Concept of “Energy” from a Transcultural Perspective.Daan F. Oostveen - 2019 - In Gunter Bombaerts, Kirsten Jenkins, Yekeen A. Sanusi & Wang Guoyu (eds.), Energy Justice Across Borders. Springer Verlag. pp. 239-252.
Nuclear Energy, Risk, and Emotions.Sabine Roeser - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):197-201.
Environment.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2009 - In Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore (eds.), What is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter: From Science to Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 151–169.
Reflections on the Reversibility of Nuclear Energy Technologies.Jan Peter Bergen - 2017 - Dissertation, Delft University of Technology
Technology, Prosperity and Risk.Sven Ove Hansson - 2012 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 481–494.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-07

Downloads
350 (#81,335)

6 months
87 (#71,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luciano Floridi
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations