The present status of the innateness controversy

In Representations: philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 257-316 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Representations: philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science.Jerry A. Fodor - 1981 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Is innateness a confused notion?Richard Samuels - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich, The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Fodor, Jerry A., "Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science". [REVIEW]William H. Panning - 1982 - Ethics 93:417.
A critical review of Jerry A. Fodor's the mind doesn't work that way. [REVIEW]Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):551 – 562.
Innateness.Steven Gross & Georges Rey - 2012 - In Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels & Stephen P. Stich, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.
On Fodor's The Mind Doesn't Work That Way.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):551-562.
Innateness as Closed Process Invariance.Ron Mallon & Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (3):323-344.
Innateness and Domain Specificity.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 105 (2):191-210.
On Fodor’s Claim that Classical Empiricists and Rationalists Agree on the Innateness of Ideas.Raffaella De Rosa - 2000 - ProtoSociology 14:240-269.
Innateness and (bayesian) visual perception: Reconciling nativism and development.Brian J. Scholl - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich, The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press on Demand. pp. 34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#921,682)

6 months
25 (#123,694)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2023 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Concepts and Cognitive Science.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 3-81.
Teleological theories of mental content.Peter Schulte & Karen Neander - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mental Representation.David Pitt - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 168 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references