Why there still has to be a language of thought

In Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

reprint Fodor, Jerry A. (1989) "Why there still has to be a language of thought". In Slezak, Peter, Computers, Brains and Minds, pp. 23--46: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1989)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
532 (#52,862)

6 months
11 (#356,365)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Representation in Cognitive Science.Nicholas Shea - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Functionalism, computationalism, and mental contents.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):375-410.
Misinformation.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):533-50.
Confusion is Corruptive Belief in False Identity.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):204-227.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references