An Illegal Assembly of One

Philosophy Today 67 (1):67-79 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Singapore, the law holds that one person may constitute an illegal assembly. This makes each person, individually and at all times, latently assembled if not actually so. But where exactly does the permissible, non-assembled one end and the unlawful, gathered one begin? How and when does one become more than one, that is, some? For here an excess of one is not many, but rather an indeterminate some. Of what does this someness consist? This essay draws on Foucault and Lacan’s discussion of the liar paradox and set theory’s concept of the “not-all” via Bateson and Kordela to make a few observations about the political subject’s constitution under illiberal democracy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to David Gallop.J. F. M. Hunter - 1983 - Dialogue 22 (1):125-129.
Moral Indifference.Ronald D. Milo - 1981 - The Monist 64 (3):373-393.
On Being Together.Paul Weiss - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):391 - 403.
An Outline of an Order Philosophy.Arnold H. Kamiat - 1938 - Philosophy 13 (50):196 - 208.
Problems some deliberative democrats have with authority.Allyn Fives - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.
The Person.Grace A. de Laguna - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):171-186.
The Person.Grace A. De Laguna - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):171 - 186.
The Paradoxes of Hylomorphism.Gordon P. Barnes - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (3):501 - 523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-03

Downloads
25 (#921,682)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references