An argument for what comes after postmodernism, and perhaps all future -isms

Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1618-1619 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00131857.2018.1461380

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What comes after postmodernism?Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1498-1499.
What comes after postmodernism?Peter Pericles Trifonas - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1362-1363.
What? Comes after postmodernism.Itay Snir - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1624-1625.
Peter Boghossian—What comes after postmodernism?Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1346-1347.
What comes after postmodernism? Going fishing.Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1614-1615.
What comes after postmodernism and how this will affect educational theory? – From a Chinese Taoist perspective.Fan Yang - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1445-1446.
Keeping the question ‘what comes after postmodernism?’ open.Karin Murris - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1600-1601.
A reply to Peter Boghsonnian and James Lindsay's, ‘What comes after postmodernism?’.Russell Webster - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (7):679-680.
Postmodernism in the afterlife.Michael A. Peters, Marek Tesar, Liz Jackson & Tina Besley - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (4):325-327.
What Science Means for Postmodernist Epistemology and the Philosophy of Education (Repr.).Thaddeus Metz - 2020 - In Michael A. Peters, Marek Tesar, Liz Jackson & Tina Besley (eds.), What Comes after Postmodernism in Educational Theory? Routledge. pp. 1398-1399.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-26

Downloads
25 (#887,547)

6 months
8 (#605,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

World hypotheses.Stephen Coburn Pepper - 1942 - Berkeley and Los Angeles,: University of California press.
The Duhem thesis and the Quine thesis.Donald Gillies - 1998 - In Martin Curd & Jan A. Cover (eds.), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues. Norton. pp. 302--319.

Add more references