Contrasting Conceptions of Creation

Review of Metaphysics 45 (1):89 - 109 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

WHILE THERE ARE MANY AFFINITIES between classical and process theism, the differences are more startling and more difficult to cope with. Process thought departs from received wisdom in at least three principal ways.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transforming Process Theism. [REVIEW]Scott F. Pentecost - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):627-628.
Two Process Philosophers. [REVIEW]F. D. D. - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (1):121-122.
The Faraway Hereafter. [REVIEW]L. S. F. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):148-148.
The Faraway Hereafter. [REVIEW]S. F. L. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):148-148.
Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes. [REVIEW]Michael Marsh - 1984 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (4):851-852.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
27 (#826,915)

6 months
5 (#1,043,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Process theism.Donald Viney - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hunky Panentheism.Roberto Rodighiero - 2019 - Sophia 58 (4):581-596.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references