Pedagogy and Politics, Confrontational Negotiations: A Response to Zhao

Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (2):225-227 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In her review of my book, Weili Zhao sheds a new light on what it means to study like a communist, particularly by focusing on the concept of the encounter and the dao movement. In this response, I build on her insights by proposing that the binary and the planar be heterogeneously blocked together. Rather than critical pedagogy, critical education, liberal education, and postmodern education, we need to see pedagogy and politics as hanging together in a confrontational negotiation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Weili Zhao.Tyson E. Lewis - 2018 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 38 (1):93-94.
Review of Derek R. Ford, Communist Study: Education for the Commons. [REVIEW]Weili Zhao - 2016 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (2):217-223.
Politics of critical pedagogy and new social movements.Seehwa Cho - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (3):310-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-07

Downloads
35 (#646,056)

6 months
4 (#1,247,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Beautiful Risk of Education.Derek R. Ford - 2016 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (2):210-213.

Add more references