- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Radical Justice: On Iris Marion Young's Critique of the “Distributive Paradigm”
Constellations 14 (2):260-265 (2007)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Food Deserts, Justice, and the Distributive Paradigm.Jennifer Szende - 2015 - In Jill Marie Dieterle (ed.), Just Food: Philosophy, Justice and Food. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Iris Young's Last Thoughts on Responsibility for Global Justice.Martha Nussbaum - 2009 - In Ann Ferguson & Mechtild Nagel (eds.), Dancing with Iris: The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young. New York: Oup Usa.
Justice and The politics of Difference - Focusing on The meaning of Iris Marion Young's Justice -.Eun Joo Kim - 2018 - EPOCH AND PHILOSOPHY 29 (4):7-40.
Resonance and Dissonance: The Role of Personal Experience in Iris Marion Young's Feminist Phenomenology.Michaele Ferguson - 2009 - In Ann Ferguson & Mechtild Nagel (eds.), Dancing with Iris: The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young. New York: Oup Usa.
Two Rawls Don't Make a Right: On Rainer Forst and the New Normativity.John McGuire - 2016 - Constellations 23 (1):110-121.
Making character disposition matter in Iris Young's deliberative democracy.Desirée Melton - 2009 - In Ann Ferguson & Mechtild Nagel (eds.), Dancing with Iris: The Philosophy of Iris Marion Young. New York: Oup Usa. pp. 173--82.
Iris Marion Young’s Conception of Political Responsibility.Alison M. Jaggar - 2007 - Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy 3 (1).
Noumenal Power, Reasons, and Justification : A Critique of Forst.Enzo Rossi & Sameer Bajaj - 2019 - In Ester Herlin-Karnell & Matthias Klatt (eds.), Constitutionalism Justified: Rainer Forst in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, Usa.
Justice Is Always a Relational Matter. On Forst’s Normativity and Power.Oana Crusmac - 2020 - Krisis 40 (1):203-208.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
293 (#93,085)
6 months
14 (#224,604)
2010-09-02
Downloads
293 (#93,085)
6 months
14 (#224,604)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why "We" Are Not Harming the Global Poor: A Critique of Pogge's Leap from State to Individual Responsibility.Uwe Steinhoff - 2012 - Public Reason 4 (1-2):119-138.
Power and the Politics of Difference: Oppression, Empowerment, and Transnational Justice.Amy Allen - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (3):156-172.
Jürgen Habermas on public reason and religion: do religious citizens suffer an asymmetrical cognitive burden, and should they be compensated?Cathrine Holst & Anders Molander - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (5):547-563.
From Social Conflicts to Human Rights: The Normative Meaning of Human Rights in Rainer Forst.Jorge Armindo Sell - 2019 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 64 (2):e32885.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lv8mh dc2