More download options

Harm: as indeterminate as ‘best interests’, but useful for triage

Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):121-122 (2016) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Categories

Biomedical Ethics in Applied Ethics

Medical Ethics in Applied Ethics

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1136/medethics-2015-103209

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
Configure custom resolver

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):119-120.

The Effects of Introducing a Harm Threshold for Medical Treatment Decisions for Children in the Courts of England & Wales: An (Inter)National Case Law Analysis.Veronica M. E. Neefjes - 2024 - Health Care Analysis 32 (3):243-259.

A sufficiency threshold is not a harm principle: A better alternative to best interests for overriding parental decisions.Ben Saunders - 2020 - Bioethics 35 (1):90-97.

Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):111-115.

Medical Decision Making for Medically Complex Children in Foster Care: Who Knows the Child’s Best Interests?Renee D. Boss, Rachel A. B. Dodge & Rebecca R. Seltzer - 2018 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 29 (2):139-144.

Is ‘best interests’ the right standard in cases like that of Charlie Gard?Robert D. Truog - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (1):16-17.

The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors.British Medical Association - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):259-263.

Minors and Contested Medical-Surgical Treatment.Jeanne Snelling - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (1):50-62.

Force-feeding, hunger strikes, Guantanamo and autonomy: replies to George Annas, Charles Foster and Michael Gross.Mirko D. Garasic - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):28-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
36 (#627,593)

6 months
14 (#229,302)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The harm threshold and parents’ obligation to benefit their children.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):123-126.

The Effects of Introducing a Harm Threshold for Medical Treatment Decisions for Children in the Courts of England & Wales: An (Inter)National Case Law Analysis.Veronica M. E. Neefjes - 2024 - Health Care Analysis 32 (3):243-259.

A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?Jo Bridgeman - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):466-470.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.

The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness.L. M. Kopelman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289.

Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):111-115.

Harm isn't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child: Table 1.Dominic Wilkinson & Tara Nair - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):116-118.

Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):119-120.

Add more references