Reid's response to Hume on double vision

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):189-194 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In issue 6.1 of the Journal of Scottish Philosophy, James Van Cleve describes Thomas Reid's understanding of double vision and then presents a challenge to his direct realism found in works of David Hume based on double vision. The challenge is as follows: When we press one eye with a finger, we immediately perceive all the objects to become double, and one half of them to be remov'd from their common and natural position. But as we do not attribute a continu'd existence to both these perceptions, and as they are both of the same nature, we clearly perceive, that all our perceptions [i.e., all the things we perceive] are dependent on our organs, and the disposition of our nerves and animal spirits. (THN: 210–211)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reid and Wells on Single and Double Vision.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Thought 3:143-163.
Reid on single and double vision: Mechanics and morals.James van Cleve - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):1-20.
Reid and Smith on Vision.Lorne Falkenstein - 2004 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 2 (2):103-118.
Reid's Direct Realism about Vision.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2006 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 23 (3):225 - 241.
Reid's response to Hume's perceptual relativity argument.Lorne Falkenstein - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):25-49.
Hume's answer to Kant.Lorne Falkenstein - 1998 - Noûs 32 (3):331-360.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-11

Downloads
66 (#319,277)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Foster
University of Sioux Falls

Citations of this work

Double appearances are double trouble: Reply to Foster.James van Cleve - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):195-196.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thomas Reid’s Geometry of Visibles.James Van Cleve - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (3):373-416.
Reid on single and double vision: Mechanics and morals.James van Cleve - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):1-20.

Add more references