The Solution of the Invariant Subspace Problem. Complex Hilbert Space. External Countable Dimensional Linear spaces Over Field *Rc#. Part II.

Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science 37 (11): 31-69 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present a new approach to the invariant subspace problem for complex Hilbert spaces.This approach based on nonconservative Extension of the Model Theoretical NSA. Our main result will be that: if T is a bounded linear operator on an infinite-dimensional complex separable Hilbert space H,it follow that T has a non-trivial closed invariant subspace.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Solution of the Invariant Subspace Problem. Part I. Complex Hilbert space.Jaykov Foukzon - 2022 - Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science 37 (10):51-89.
Quantum logics and hilbert space.Sylvia Pulmannová - 1994 - Foundations of Physics 24 (10):1403-1414.
Definable Operators on Hilbert Spaces.Isaac Goldbring - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (2):193-201.
What Is Quantum Information? Information Symmetry and Mechanical Motion.Vasil Penchev - 2020 - Information Theory and Research eJournal (Elsevier: SSRN) 1 (20):1-7.
Constructive compact operators on a Hilbert space.Hajime Ishihara - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):31-37.
A geometric approach to quantum mechanics.J. Anandan - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (11):1265-1284.
Coulomb Potential from Lorentz Invariance in N Dimensions.Martin Land - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (4-5):597-631.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-09

Downloads
239 (#110,657)

6 months
55 (#96,845)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Set theory with a Filter quantifier.Matt Kaufmann - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (2):263-287.

Add more references