It Probably is a Valid Experimental Result: a Bayesian Approach to the Epistemology of Experiment

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (4):419 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0039-3681(88)90009-x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Experiment, Right or Wrong by Allan Franklin; Experimental Inquiries: Historical, Philosophical, and Social Studies of Experimentation in Science by Homer E. Le Grand. [REVIEW]Yuelin Zhu - 1994 - Isis 85:489-491.
Experiment, Right or Wrong.Allan Franklin - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Experimental ProbabilityThe Neglect of Experiment. Allan Franklin.Peter Galison - 1988 - Isis 79 (3):467-470.
The Neglect of Experiment. Allan Franklin. [REVIEW]Ian Hacking - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):306-308.
Review of The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences by David Gooding; Trevor Pinch; Simon Schaffer Experiment, Right or Wrong by Allan Franklin. [REVIEW]Ian Hacking - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):705-708.
Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment.Allan Franklin - 2002 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
The experimenters' regress reconsidered: Replication, tacit knowledge, and the dynamics of knowledge generation.Uljana Feest - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 58:34-45.
Allan Franklin, Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press , 288pp., $38.50. [REVIEW]Klaus Hentschel - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):607-610.
No Easy Answers: Science and the Pursuit of Knowledge.Allan Franklin - 2005 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
The Cobe Dmr Experiment and the Confirmation and Acceptance of Experimental Results: Challenging Current Theories in Philosophy of Science.Jeffery Lynn Mullins - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
58 (#363,216)

6 months
3 (#1,472,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Towards a Typology of Experimental Errors: an Epistemological View.Giora Hon - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (4):469.
Franklin, Holmes, and the epistemology of computer simulation.Wendy S. Parker - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Variation and the accuracy of predictions.Michael Kruse - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):181-193.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Why do Scientists Prefer to Vary their Experiments?Allan Franklin - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (1):51.
Novel facts and bayesianism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):375-379.
Some recent objections to the bayesian theory of support.Colin Howson - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):305-309.
A bayesian analysis of excess content and the localisation of support.Colin Howson & Allan Franklin - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (4):425-431.
On the utility of repeating the 'same' experiment.Peter Urbach - 1981 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):151 – 162.

View all 6 references / Add more references