The paradox of the element curved upside down in the Neiko gate that cannot be straightened

Abstract

By disserting on “Symmetry in Physical Laws” during one of his lectures, Richard P. Feynman asked: «Why is nature so nearly symmetrical?». He added: «No one has any idea why. The only thing we might suggest is something like this: There is a gate in Japan, a gate in Neiko, which is sometimes called by the Japanese the most beautiful gate in all Japan; it was built in a time when there was a great influence from Chinese art. This gate is very elaborate, with lots of gables and beautiful carving and lots of columns and dragon heads and princes carved into the pillars, and so on. But when one looks closely he sees that in the elaborate and complex design along one of the pillars, one of the small design elements is carved upside down; otherwise the thing is completely symmetrical. If one asks why this is, the story is that it was carved upside down so that the gods will not be jealous of the perfection of man. So they purposely put an error in there, so that the gods would not be jealous and get angry with human beings. We might like to turn the idea around and think that the true explanation of the near symmetry of nature is this: that God made the laws only nearly symmetrical so that we should not be jealous of His perfection!». In attempting to provide an answer to the Feynman’s question, the present paper show how one inevitably incurs a paradox.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Animals and the Unity of Psychology.Gareth B. Matthews - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (206):437-454.
Infinity in Pascal's Wager.Graham Oppy - 2018 - In Paul Bartha & Lawrence Pasternack (eds.), Pascal’s Wager. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 260-77.
The One of Plotinus and the God of Aristotle.John M. Rist - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (1):75 - 87.
How To Get About.David Sosa - 2024 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 95:143-156.
The Paradox of the Question.Ned Markosian - 1997 - Analysis 57 (2):95-97.
The Criterion of Reality.W. H. Sheldon - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 1 (3):3 - 37.
The Gates of Sleep in Aeneid 6.Nicholas Reed - 1973 - Classical Quarterly 23 (02):311-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
9 (#1,530,602)

6 months
5 (#1,062,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references