Imaginary mistakes versus real problems in generative grammar

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):677-678 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jackendoff claims that current theories of generative grammar commit a “scientific mistake” by assuming that syntax is the sole source of linguistic organization (“syntactocentrism”). The claim is false, and furthermore, Jackendoff's solution to the alleged problem, the parallel architecture, creates a real problem that exists in no other theory of generative grammar.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Grammar yes, generative grammar no.Michael Tomasello - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):759-760.
Syntax, generative grammar.E. K. Brown - 1982 - London: Hutchinson. Edited by J. E. Miller.
Generative Semantik: semant. Syntax.Pieter Albertus Maria Seuren - 1973 - Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann. Edited by Christoph Harbsmeier.
Jackendoff's conceptualism.James Higginbotham - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):680-681.
Cognitive Linguistics.Michael Tomasello - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 477–487.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#314,715)

6 months
7 (#704,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references