Definability degrees

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):448-449 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We establish the equiconsistency of a simple statement in definability theory with the failure of the GCH at all infinite cardinals. The latter was shown by Foreman and Woodin to be consistent, relative to the existence of large cardinals

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Weak Indestructibility and Reflection.James Holland - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):980-1006.
A new condensation principle.Thoralf Räsch & Ralf Schindler - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (2):159-166.
On HOD-supercompactness.Grigor Sargsyan - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (7-8):765-768.
Internal consistency and the inner model hypothesis.Sy-David Friedman - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (4):591-600.
Strong Cardinals and Sets of Reals in Lω1.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (3):361-369.
Measurable cardinals and good ‐wellorderings.Philipp Lücke & Philipp Schlicht - 2018 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 64 (3):207-217.
Ns Saturated and -Definable.Stefan Hoffelner - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (1):25-59.
The failure of GCH at a degree of supercompactness.Brent Cody - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1):83-94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
24 (#951,749)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Forcing closed unbounded sets.Uri Abraham & Saharon Shelah - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):643-657.

Add more references