Interpreting set theory in ordinary thinking: Concept calculus

Abstract

STARTLING OBSERVATION. Any two natural theories S,T, known to interpret EFA, are known (with small numbers of exceptions) to have: S is interpretable in T or T is interpretable in S. The exceptions are believed to also have comparability.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Classification and interpretation.Andreas Baudisch - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):138-159.
Model theory of Steiner triple systems.Silvia Barbina & Enrique Casanovas - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (2):2050010.
A note on the consistency operator.James Walsh - 2020 - Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 148 (6):2645--2654.
Faith & falsity.Albert Visser - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 131 (1-3):103-131.
On atomic or saturated sets.Ludomir Newelski - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):318-333.
Reconciling Omniscience and Freedom: Ockhamist and Molinist Strategies.Mark Daniel Linville - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
228 (#113,345)

6 months
228 (#12,268)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references