{Page }

Abstract

All axiomatizations in sections 1,2,4-8 are in the language L(Î,W) with just Î and the constant symbol W standing for a Subworld. Think of W as yesterday's world, and think of the quantifiers in the theory as ranging over today's world. The philosophy is that since the universe cannot be completed, every time we reflect on the universe and what we have reflected on previously, we obtain a larger universe.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Page.Ken Wilber - unknown
Title-Page and Index to Volume LXV facing page.Charles T. Murphy - 1972 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 65 (8-9):264.
Tristram shandy's last page.Robin Small - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):213-216.
On this page.Introducing False Eur & E. U. R. False - 2000 - Complexity 286 (1).
On this page.A. Structural Model Of Turnout & In Voting - 2011 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 9 (4).
On this page.Regional Earnings Inequality in Great Britain - 2006 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 46 (5).
Title Page.Редакція Журналу - 2021 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 92 (92).
A Page at the Orchestra.Carla Nappi - 2016 - In Susan Neiman, Peter Galison & Wendy Doniger (eds.), What Reason Promises: Essays on Reason, Nature and History. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 221-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#435,788)

6 months
50 (#101,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references