The Co-Operative and the Corporation: Competing Visions of the Future of Fair Trade

Journal of Business Ethics 86 (S1):81 - 95 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the fair trade network in the North through a comparative assessment of two distinctly different fair trade certified roasters: Planet Bean, a worker-owned co-operative in Guelph, Ontario; and Starbucks Coffee Company, the world's largest specialty roaster. The two organizations are assessed on the basis of their distinct visions of the fair trade mission and their understandings of "consumer sovereignty". It is concluded that the objectives of Planet Bean are more compatible with the moral mission of fair trade, even while the network has become increasingly dependent on the market-reach of corporations like Starbucks, raising difficult prospects for the future of fair trade

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The university and the moral imperative of fair trade coffee.Gavin Fridell - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):141-159.
More than 27 Cents a Day.Gina Bramucci & Shannon Mulholland - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 193–204.
Fair Trade: A Cup at a Time?April Linton & Margaret Levi - 2003 - Politics and Society 31 (3):407-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
158 (#146,294)

6 months
5 (#1,043,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

.Neil Coffee - unknown
No Logo.Naomi Klein - 2007 - Science and Society 71 (3):361-363.
Corporate governance reforms in developing countries.Darryl Reed - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):223 - 247.
The university and the moral imperative of fair trade coffee.Gavin Fridell - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):141-159.

Add more references