Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations

Dialogue 62 (3):459-474 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to the claim that democracies are inherently short-termist, this article argues for a new way to understand them as being committed to future generations. If taking turns among rulers and ruled is a normative idea inherent to the concept of democracy, then such turn-taking commits democrats to a fair turn with future generations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship.Dennis F. Thompson - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):17-37.
The intergenerational turn and terrestrial space.Matthias Fritsch - 2025 - Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 11 (2).
What’s wrong with the presentist bias? On the threat of intergenerational domination.Anja Karnein - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (5):725-746.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-08

Downloads
35 (#678,037)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthias Fritsch
Concordia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references