Trustworthiness and truth: The epistemic pitfalls of internet accountability

Episteme 11 (1):63-81 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since anonymous agents can spread misinformation with impunity, many people advocate for greater accountability for internet speech. This paper provides a veritistic argument that accountability mechanisms can cause significant epistemic problems for internet encyclopedias and social media communities. I show that accountability mechanisms can undermine both the dissemination of true beliefs and the detection of error. Drawing on social psychology and behavioral economics, I suggest alternative mechanisms for increasing the trustworthiness of internet communication

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Précis of Who Should We Be Online? A Social Epistemology for the Internet.Karen Frost-Arnold - 2024 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 93:155-156.
Attunement: On the Cognitive Virtues of Attention.Georgi Gardiner - 2022 - In Mark Alfano, Jeroen De Ridder & Colin Klein (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-16

Downloads
5,361 (#1,282)

6 months
221 (#11,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Frost-Arnold
Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Citations of this work

How Twitter gamifies communication.C. Thi Nguyen - 2021 - In Jennifer Lackey (ed.), Applied Epistemology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 410-436.
Towards a Critical Social Epistemology of Social Media.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2025 - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Simion and Kelp on trustworthy AI.J. Adam Carter - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-8.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations