Standing Up for What You Don’t Believe

The Philosophers' Magazine 41 (41):76-81 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Knowledge is a collective enterprise, all of whose members potentially benefit from any one of them managing to achieve, or at least approximate, the truth. However, it does not follow that the best way to do this is by trying to establish the truth for oneself as a fixed belief and then making it plain for all to hear or see, so that it might spread like a virus, or “meme”, as Richard Dawkins might say.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Standing Up for What You Don’t Believe.Steve Fuller - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 41 (41):76-81.
What would you like to believe today?Michael LaBossiere - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 36:31-31.
Nice is overrated.Mélanie Frappier - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 43 (43):107-112.
Nice is overrated.Mélanie Frappier - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 43 (43):107-112.
What do Religious Believers Believe?Richard Norman - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68:105-124.
What can the Stoics do for us?Antonia Macaro - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 49 (49):81-88.
What can the Stoics do for us?Antonia Macaro - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 49 (49):81-88.
The Interview.Martha Nussbaum & James Garvey - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):21-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
87 (#241,372)

6 months
20 (#147,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references