The Demarcation of Science: A Problem Whose Demise has Been Greatly Exaggerated

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66 (3-4):329-341 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,992

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Steve Fuller, Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. [REVIEW]F. Remedios - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):97-99.
Margaret Fuller and Childe Roland.M. Whitcomb Hess - 1947 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 28 (4):376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
35 (#706,668)

6 months
6 (#698,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Fuller
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-243.
The sociology of scientific knowledge: Can we ever get it straight?Peter T. Manicas & Alan Rosenberg - 1988 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 18 (1):51–76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references