Scholarly merits: From measurement to judgment

Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (6):1145-1147 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The discussion in Perspectives on Psychological Science about criteria for scholarly merit shows a potential bias of quantitative measurements compared with informed judgments of scholarly merits. This comment argues for a selection procedure that is open for qualitative arguments.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Unfamiliarity with Key Elements of Scholarly Writing and Research Impedes Ethical Publishing.Edward Barroga - 2023 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 4 (1):34-38.
The search for the historical gassendi.Margaret J. Osler - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (2):212-229.
Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry [reprinted in current contents 45: 9-13, november 11 1991]. [REVIEW]Stevan Harnad - 1990 - Psychological Science 1:342-343.
Taking on commercial scholarly journals: Reflections on the 'open access' movement. [REVIEW]Richard Wellen - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):101-118.
Perspectives on Scholarly Misconduct in the Sciences.J. M. Braxton (ed.) - 1999 - Ohio State University Press.
The validity and reliability of evaluation of scholarly performance.A. J. Nederhof - 1988 - In A. F. J. Van Raan (ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co.. pp. 193--228.
Dispersed Personae: Subject-matters of scholarly biography in nineteenth-century oriental philology.Henning Trüper - 2013 - .
New Perspectives in the Adaptive Assessment of Depression: The ATS-PD Version of the QuEDS.Andrea Spoto, Francesca Serra, Ivan Donadello, Umberto Granziol & Giulio Vidotto - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:372933.
The logistics of the Republic of Letters: mercantile undercurrents of early modern scholarly knowledge circulation.Jacob Orrje - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Science 53 (3):351-369.
Scholarly Twitter Metrics.Stefanie Haustein - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 729-760.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-13

Downloads
260 (#103,153)

6 months
118 (#47,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joachim Funke
University of Heidelberg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references