Boolean negation and non-conservativity II: The variable-sharing property

Logic Journal of the IGPL 29 (3):363-369 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many relevant logics are conservatively extended by Boolean negation. Not all, however. This paper shows an acute form of non-conservativeness, namely that the Boolean-free fragment of the Boolean extension of a relevant logic need not always satisfy the variable-sharing property. In fact, it is shown that such an extension can in fact yield classical logic. For a vast range of relevant logic, however, it is shown that the variable-sharing property, restricted to the Boolean-free fragment, still holds for the Boolean extended logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-17

Downloads
58 (#369,129)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tore Fjetland Øgaard
University of Bergen

Citations of this work

Variable-Sharing as Relevance.Shawn Standefer - 2025 - In Andrew Tedder, Shawn Standefer & Igor Sedlar (eds.), New Directions in Relevant Logic. Springer.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Classical relevant logics II.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley - 1974 - Studia Logica 33 (2):183 - 194.
Entailment and relevance.Nuel D. Belnap - 1960 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (2):144-146.
Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.
Gentzenizations of relevant logics with distribution.Ross T. Brady - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (2):402-420.

View all 12 references / Add more references