Entailment Generalized

In Andrew Tedder, Shawn Standefer & Igor Sedlar (eds.), New Directions in Relevant Logic. Springer. pp. 317-341 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two Hilbert calculi in the use-restricted relevance tradition of Anderson and Belnap are presented. One yields Anderson and Belnap's conjunctive version of the so-called ``entailment theorem,'' whereas the other yields the implication-iterated version. In contrast to previous such use-restricted calculi, those presented in this paper apply to arbitrary strengthenings of the weak contractionless logic B without need for modifying the use-conditions. As such they help to identify the core idea of the ``use-account'' of relevance.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Power of Belnap: Sequent Systems for SIXTEEN ₃. [REVIEW]Heinrich Wansing - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):369 - 393.
LEt ® , LR °[^( ~ )], LK and cutfree proofs.Katalin Bimbó - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):557-570.
Deducibility, Entailment and Analytic Containment.Richard Bradshaw Angell - 1989 - In J. Norman & R. Sylvan (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic. Dordrecht and Boston: Springer. pp. 119-143.
Confused Entailment.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2021 - Topoi 41 (1):207-219.
Semantics for analytic containment.Fabrice Correia - 2004 - Studia Logica 77 (1):87-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tore Fjetland Øgaard
University of Bergen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references