A Sound And Complete Deductive System For Ctl* Verification

Logic Journal of the IGPL 16 (6):499-536 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper presents a compositional approach to the verification of CTL* properties over reactive systems. Both symbolic model-checking and deductive verification are considered. Both methods are based on two decomposition principles. A general state formula is decomposed into basic state formulas which are CTL* formulas with no embedded path quantifiers. To deal with arbitrary basic state formulas, we introduce another reduction principle which replaces each basic path formula, i.e., path formulas whose principal operator is temporal and which contain no embedded temporal operators or path quantifiers, by a newly introduced boolean variable which is added to the system. Thus, both the algorithmic and the deductive methods are based on two statification transformations which successively replace temporal formulas by assertions which contain no path quantifiers or temporal operators. Performing these decompositions repeatedly, we remain with basic assertional formulas, i.e., formulas of the form Efp and Afp for some assertion p. In the model-checking method we present a single symbolic algorithm to verify both universal and existential basic assertional properties. In the deductive method we present a small set of proof rules and show that this set is sound and relatively complete for verifying universal and existential basic assertional properties over reactive systems. Together with two proof rules for the decompositions, we obtain a sound and relatively complete proof system for arbitrary CTL* properties. Interestingly, the deductive approach for CTL* presented here, offers a viable new approach to the deductive verification of arbitrary LTL formulas. The paper corrects a previous preliminary version of a deductive system for CTL*, in which some of the rules were unsound. The correction is based on the introduction of a new type of temporal testers which are guaranteed to be non blocking. That is, when composed with a deadlock-free system, which is a key operation in the verification process, the resulting composed system is guaranteed to remain deadlock free

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
28 (#789,065)

6 months
5 (#1,015,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dov Gabbay
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Cognitive Economics and the Logic of Abduction.John Woods - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (1):148-161.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An axiomatization of full computation tree logic.M. Reynolds - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1011-1057.
Verification of concurrent programs: the automata-theoretic framework.Moshe Y. Vardi - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (1-2):79-98.

Add more references