From the specious to the suspicious present: The jack Horner phenomenology of William James

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 11 (3):163-189 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Richard M. Gale, The Philosophy of William James: An Introduction Reviewed by.John R. Shook - 2005 - Philosophy in Review 25 (3):179-181.
Richard M. Gale, The Divided Self of William James Reviewed by.Matthew Stephens - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (2):113-115.
Critical Notice.Richard M. Gale - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):491-494.
William James and the Specious Present.David L. Miller - 1976 - In Walter Robert Corti (ed.), The philosophy of William James. Hamburg: Meiner. pp. 51--79.
"William James and Phenomenology" by James M. Edie. [REVIEW]Gerald E. Myers - 1989 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (3):538.
James M. Edie, William James and Phenomenology Reviewed by.William James Earle - 1988 - Philosophy in Review 8 (7):260-265.
Review: The divided self of William James. [REVIEW]Graham Bird - 2002 - Mind 111 (441):100-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#402,540)

6 months
6 (#823,508)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references