Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto

Philosophical Studies 176 (3):839-851 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay, I respond to the critical remarks of Louise Barrett, Amanda Corris and Anthony Chemero, and Daniel Hutto on my book Enactivist Interventions. In doing so, I consider whether behaviorism can make a contribution to enactivist theory, whether synergies are the same as dynamical gestalts, and whether the brain can add anything to mathematical reasoning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-01

Downloads
55 (#409,745)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?