What “realistic utopias” are — and aren’t

Social Philosophy and Policy 33 (1-2):235-251 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

:Political theory is not a purely theoretical enterprise; it is intended to be practical and action-guiding. To perform this role, the requirements of political theory must be possible, and the standard of possibility it employs must be appropriate to the political domain. Because human beings vary in their capacity for morality and justice, a reasonably just society, as Rawls understands it, must not be expected. Despite his concerns to the contrary, the possibility of a just polity is not needed to ward off resignation and cynicism. There is a principled path between a politics of complacency that thwarts feasible progress and a politics of utopian aspiration that ends by inflicting harm in the name of doing good.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-24

Downloads
54 (#405,619)

6 months
13 (#276,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bright Lines in Juvenile Justice.Amy Berg - 2021 - Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (3):330-352.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What’s Ideal About Ideal Theory?Zofia Stemplowska - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (3):319-340.
The Feasibility Condition in Political Theory.J. Räikkä - 1998 - Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1):27-40.

Add more references