The study of indian epistemology: Questions of method—a reply to Matthew dasti and Stephen H. Phillips

Philosophy East and West 60 (4):541-550 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I would like to thank the editors of Philosophy East and West for courteously asking me if I would like to respond to Matthew Dasti and Stephen Phillips' very thoughtful remarks about the review I wrote of Phillips' translation and commentary on the pratyakṣa chapter of Gaṅgeśa's Tattvacintāmaṇi, prepared in collaboration with N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya (Phillips and Tatacharya 2004). Let me begin by reaffirming what I said at the beginning of my review, that the book is "a monumental and momentous achievement, one whose importance cannot be understated." I have indeed enormous admiration for the magnitude of their achievement and respect for the contribution they have made through this translation to the field of ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Commentators on Waking, Dreaming, Being.Evan Thompson - 2016 - Philosophy East and West 66 (3):982-1000.
"Why Be Moral?" and Other Matters: Reply to Liu, Tiwald, and Yu.Yong Huang - 2019 - Philosophy East and West 69 (1):295-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-21

Downloads
93 (#220,733)

6 months
11 (#305,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references