How law claims, what law claims

In Matthias Klatt (ed.), Institutionalized reason: the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. New York: Oxford University Press (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, written for a volume on the work of Robert Alexy, I discuss the idea that law makes certain distinctive claims, an idea familiar from the work of both Alexy and Joseph Raz. I begin by refuting some criticisms by Ronald Dworkin of the very idea of law as a claim-maker. I then discuss whether, as Alexy and Raz agree, law's claim is a moral one. Having arrived at an affirmative verdict, I discuss the content of law's moral claim. Is it, as Alexy says, a claim to moral correctness? Or is it, as Raz says, a claim to moral authority?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How law claims, what law claims.John Gardner - 2012 - In Matthias Klatt (ed.), Institutionalized reason: the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Robert Alexy and the Dual Nature of Law.Torben Spaak - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (2):150-168.
Institutionalized reason: the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy.Matthias Klatt (ed.) - 2012 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Assessing Law's Claim to Authority.Bas van der Vossen - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (3):481-501.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
136 (#163,177)

6 months
3 (#1,470,638)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Gardner
James Madison University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references