- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Way of the Dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism
Philosophy East and West 58 (3):395 - 402 (2008)
Abstract
Anyone who is accustomed to the view that contradictions cannot be true, and cannot be accepted, and who reads texts in the Buddhists traditions will be struck by the fact that they frequently contain contradictions. Just consider, for example.Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The way of the dialetheist: Contradictions in buddhism.Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield & Graham Priest - 2008 - Philosophy East and West 58 (3):pp. 395-402.
A Comment on" The Way of the Dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism," by Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest.Brook Ziporyn - 2013 - Philosophy East and West 63 (3):344-352.
Is Gorampa's "Freedom from Conceptual Proliferations" Dialetheist?Constance Kassor - 2013 - Philosophy East and West 63 (3):399-410.
The Logical and Philosophical Foundations for the Possibility of True Contradictions.Ben Martin - 2014 - Dissertation, University College London
Can Rational Dialetheism Be Refuted By Considerations about Negation and Denial?Mark Sainsbury - 1997 - ProtoSociology 10:216-229.
Contradiction Club: Dialetheism and the Social World.Matthew J. Cull & Emma Bolton - 2019 - Journal of Social Ontology 5 (2):169-180.
How do Madhyamikas think? Notes on Jay Garfield, Graham Priest, and paraconsistency.Tom J. F. Tillemans - 2009 - In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans, Pointing at the moon: Buddhism, logic, analytic philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-12-22
Downloads
349 (#84,663)
6 months
22 (#130,078)
2010-12-22
Downloads
349 (#84,663)
6 months
22 (#130,078)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
‘Snakes and Ladders’ – ‘Therapy’ as Liberation in Nagarjuna and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Joshua William Smith - 2021 - Sophia 60 (2):411-430.
Defending the Semantic Interpretation: A Reply to Ferraro.Mark Siderits & Jay L. Garfield - 2013 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (6):655-664.
References found in this work
Nagarjuna and the limits of thought.Jay L. Garfield & Graham Priest - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (1):1-21.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-7fk9p dc2