Abstract

Davidson’s non-normative argument for the claim that inquiry does not aim at truth has not received much attention in the epistemological literature of the past two decades. As far as I know, only Christopher Hookway (2012) and Christoph Kelp (2021) have discussed it. Moreover, they have both rejected it, on similar grounds. After reconstructing Davidson’s argument, I turn to Hookway’s and Kelp’s criticisms and show why Davidson’s argument can in fact resist them.