Steve Prefontaine: artist on the track?

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

American distance running legend Steve Prefontaine – ‘Pre’ – claimed that he was an artist and that his races were works of art. In this article, I examine and defend Pre’s claims. Using Robert Stecker’s definition of art as a guide, I argue that a race can be a work of art – specifically, performance art. I then argue that Pre’s 3,000 m American record race at the 1972 Bislett Games in Oslo, Norway, and his 5,000 m final at the 1972 Munich Olympics illustrate his view of himself as an artist and are works of art in Stecker’s sense of achieving excellence in fulfilling an artistic function.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-29

Downloads
1 (#1,944,520)

6 months
1 (#1,886,937)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Differences Between Sport and Art.Christopher Cordner - 1988 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15 (1):31-47.
Sport is not art.David Best - 1985 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 12 (1):25-40.
Beauty, Sport, and Gender.J. M. Boxill - 1984 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 11 (1):36-47.
Art and Sport.David Best - 1980 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 14 (2):69.

View all 14 references / Add more references