- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
advantages of student subjects: What is your research question?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):92-93 (2010)
Abstract
I argue that the right choice of subject pool is intimately linked to the research question. At least within economics, students are often the perfect subject pool for answering some fundamental research questions. Student subject pools can provide an invaluable benchmark for investigating generalizability across different social groups or cultures.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Psychology ethics down under: A survey of student subject pools in australia.Mark R. Diamond & Daniel D. Reidpath - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (2):101 – 108.
Ethical Issues in Accounting and Economics Experimental Research: Inducing Strategic Misrepresentation.David T. Dearman - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):51-59.
Benefits of hereditarian insights for mate choice and parenting.Geoffrey F. Miller - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e196.
Ethical Issues in Accounting and Economics Experimental Research: Inducing Strategic Misrepresentation.Dr David T. Dearman & James E. Beard - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):51-59.
Challenges for everyone: Real people, deception, one-shot games, social learning, and computers.Joseph Henrich - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):414-415.
Culture and individual differences.Arthur B. Markman, Serge Blok, John Dennis, Micah Goldwater, Kyungil Kim, Jeff Laux, Lisa Narvaez & Eric Taylor - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):831-831.
Protecting Research Subjects from Prohibited Multi-Participation in Clinical Trials.Hans-Peter Graf - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (4):136-147.
Approving or Improving Research Ethics in Management Journals.Michelle Greenwood - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 137 (3):507-520.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#643,789)
6 months
9 (#477,108)
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#643,789)
6 months
9 (#477,108)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
The weirdest people in the world?Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):61-83.
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies.Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, Jean Ensminger, Natalie Smith Henrich, Kim Hill, Francisco Gil-White, Michael Gurven, Frank W. Marlowe & John Q. Patton - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):795-815.
Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms.Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gächter - 2002 - Human Nature 13 (1):1-25.
Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules.Nicholas Bardsley, Robin Cubitt, Graham Loomes, Peter Moffat, Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden - 2009 - Princeton University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2