Russell on Meaning and Denoting

Analysis 19 (3):69-72 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author states: "in a recent article searle has shown the odd irrelevance of russell's criticisms of frege in the famous paper 'on denoting'. I here offer an explanation of the oddity: russell had excusably, But wrongly, Conflated frege's distinction between sinn and bedeutung with his own distinction between what an expression 'means' and what it 'denotes'."

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Russell on Meaning and Denoting.David Kaplan - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (1):143-144.
Russell versus Frege.Imre Ruzsa - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):13-20.
Acquaintance, denoting concepts, and sense.James Levine - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (3):415-445.
A Cantorian argument against Frege's and early Russell's theories of descriptions.Kevin C. Klement - 2008 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". London and New York: Routledge. pp. 65-77.
Sense, Reference and Ontology in Early Analytic Philosophy.Max Langan Rosenkrantz - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
131 (#167,524)

6 months
15 (#202,268)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references