The contingent a priori: Kripke's two types of examples

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):195 – 205 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Naming and Necessity' Saul A. Kripke gives two types of examples of contingent truths knowable a priori. So he disagrees with the first leg of the thesis. As we will see later, his examples depend on the direct designation theory of names. While there have been attempts to provide examples of the contingent a priori that do not depend on that theory, most of those examples should be viewed as expansions, or modifications, of Kripke's examples. Philip Kitcher, for example, gives an interesting example that has nothing to do with theories of names, but is produced using the indexical 'actual'.2 His example, however, is a variation of Kripke's Neptune Type example.' In what follows I will focus on Kripke's two types of examples and modifications of them. I will argue that although both types of example fail, it is possible to modify his Standard Metre example in such a way that we have an example of the contingent a priori

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
164 (#141,834)

6 months
10 (#394,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Heimir Geirsson
Iowa State University

Citations of this work

Kripke & the existential complaint.Greg Ray - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 74 (2):121 - 135.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references