Nature and society in social anthropology

Philosophy of Science 30 (3):236-251 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is concerned to argue that the social sciences and notably social anthropology, must necessarily be concerned with the physical environment of the societies investigated (which includes the biological nature of its members), and not only with the social reality which is at the centre of their concern. This is argued with special reference to fields such as kinship and politics, and to social relationships such as paternity or feuding. The article is concerned to refute arguments put forward in support of the logical autonomy of social studies, particularly in the sphere of kinship, in earlier articles by Barnes and Needham

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Physical and social kinship.J. A. Barnes - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):296-299.
Ernest Gellner and Modernity.Michael Harry Lessnoff - 2002 - Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Thinking about kinship and thinking.Doug Jones - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):404-416.
Social Reality.Finn Collin - 1997 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#303,591)

6 months
15 (#200,807)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Physical and social facts in anthropology.J. A. Barnes - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (3):294-297.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Descent systems and ideal language.Rodney Needham - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (1):96-101.
Ideal language and kinship structure.Ernest Gellner - 1957 - Philosophy of Science 24 (3):235-242.
Physical and social kinship.J. A. Barnes - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):296-299.

Add more references