What Are the Grounds of Explication?

The Monist 49 (1):137-164 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I will attempt to discuss linguistic analysis and phenomenology accurately so that the adherents of each can agree with what I say, and yet also the discussion of each method must be understandable to the adherents of the other. If I can really do that, the basic similarities will appear. I will attempt to state some propositions that apply to both frames of reference. The similarities which these propositions state are basic aspects of philosophic method, and they also pose a major problem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Are the Grounds of Explication?Eugene T. Gendlin - 1965 - The Monist 49 (1):137-164.
Belief Systems as Artifacts.Risto Hilpinen - 1995 - The Monist 78 (2):136-155.
The Concept of Rational Belief.Richard B. Brandt - 1985 - The Monist 68 (1):3-23.
Doing Philosophy Historically.Robert Piercey - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):779 - 800.
Purity in Morals.Frances Myrna - 1983 - The Monist 66 (2):283-297.
Starting and Stopping.C. L. Hamblin - 1969 - The Monist 53 (3):410-425.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
102 (#205,306)

6 months
17 (#166,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Response.E. T. Gendlin - 1994 - Human Studies 17 (3):381-400.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references