Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science

Scientia et Fides 4 (2):397-415 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article highlights certain recurring themes in Mariano Artigas’s works by examining a judicial decision made in the United States in 1982 concerning the teaching of “creation-science” alongside “evolution-science” in public schools. These themes include: the proper delimitation of the boundaries of science, the importance of philosophy as a bridge between science and religion, and the misunderstandings concerning the limits of science inherent in scientism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Artigas and Analytic Philosophy.Sebastian De Haro - 2016 - Scientia et Fides 4 (2):215-243.
Mariano Artigas: 1979–1987.José María Valderas - 2016 - Scientia et Fides 4 (2):57-75.
Creation-Science Rhetoric.Philip Bashor - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:489-515.
Creation-Science Rhetoric.Philip Bashor - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:489-515.
God Talk: Confusion between Science and Religion: Posthumous Essay.Dorothy Nelkin - 2004 - Science, Technology and Human Values 29 (2):139-152.
Arguing from the Evidence.Brian A. Thomasson - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):495-534.
Arguing from the Evidence.Brian A. Thomasson - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):495-534.
The Role of Metaphysics: As a Bridge between Science and Religion.مهدی گلشنی - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 14 (32):369-384.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-24

Downloads
37 (#612,504)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marie I. George
St. John's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations