${\rm S}3.02={\rm S}3.03$

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):147-148 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The deduction theorem in ${\rm S}4,$ ${\rm S}4.2$, and ${\rm S}5$.J. Jay Zeman - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (1-2):56-60.
${\rm S}4.6$ is ${\rm S}4.9$.J. Jay Zeman - 1972 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (1):118-118.
A theorem on ${\rm S}4.2$ and ${\rm S}4.4$.Ivo Thomas - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (4):335-336.
The Gupta-Belnap systems ${\rm S}^\#$ and ${\rm S}^*$ are not axiomatisable.Philip Kremer - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):583-596.
${\rm E}$ and ${\rm S}4$.Robert K. Meyer - 1970 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 11 (2):181-199.
Modal trees for ${\rm T}$ and ${\rm S}5$.B. Davidson, F. C. Jackson & R. Pargetter - 1977 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (4):602-606.
A proper subsystem of ${\rm S}4.{\rm O}4.$.Bolesław Sobociński - 1971 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (3):381-384.
Semantics for ${\rm S}4.1.2$.Dolph Ulrich - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):461-464.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
29 (#772,073)

6 months
19 (#151,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references