- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Talking Can Be Harmful Depending on What You Say
American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):42-44 (2020)
Abstract
McCarthy, Homan, and Rozier’s presentation of theological anthropology and its contribution to secular bioethics suffers from three primary limitations. (McCarthy et al. 2020) First, the article re...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
‘There’s No Harm in Talking’…True…But It Depends on How We Talk and What We Then Do.Patrick T. Smith - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):32-34.
Community, Complicity, and Critique: Christian Concepts in Secular Bioethics.Aline H. Kalbian, Courtney S. Campbell & James F. Childress - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):37-39.
The Social Context of Religion in the Jurisdictions of Bioethics.John H. Evans - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):1-4.
Correlating Bioethics and Theology.Nathan Carlin - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):49-51.
Public Reason as the Way for Dialogue.Hon-Lam Li - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):29-31.
Pluralism in the Jewish Ethical Tradition.Keenan Davis - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):16-18.
Ethical Analysis and Beyond! How Christian Anthropology and the Concept of Dignity Can Also Address Moral Distress in End-of-Life Care.Claire Horner & David Garvis - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):23-25.
Vulnerable Life: Reflections on the Relationship Between Theological and Philosophical Ethics.Matthias Braun - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):21-23.
There’s No Harm in Talking: Re-Establishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics.Michael McCarthy, Mary Homan & Michael Rozier - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):5-13.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-17
Downloads
22 (#1,015,764)
6 months
6 (#572,300)
2020-11-17
Downloads
22 (#1,015,764)
6 months
6 (#572,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Response to Open Peer Commentaries for “There’s No Harm in Talking: Reestablishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics”.Michael McCarthy, Mary Homan & Michael Rozier - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):W1-W3.
References found in this work
There’s No Harm in Talking: Re-Establishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics.Michael McCarthy, Mary Homan & Michael Rozier - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):5-13.
Gendered morality: classical Islamic ethics of the self, family, and society.Zahra M. S. Ayubi - 2019 - New York: Columbia University Press.
A Critique of Contemporary Islamic Bioethics.Abbas Rattani - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (2):357-361.
On the role of religion in articles this journal seeks to publish.Udo Schuklenk - 2018 - Developing World Bioethics 18 (3):207-207.
Duty and healing: foundations of a Jewish bioethic.Benjamin Freedman - 1999 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Charles Weijer.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-kjfxj dc2