Could There Ever Be a Duty to Have Children?

In Sarah Hannan, Samantha Brennan & Richard Vernon (eds.), Permissible Progeny?: The Morality of Procreation and Parenting. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 87-106 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues that there is a collective responsibility to have enough children in order to ensure that people will not, in the future, suffer great harm due to depopulation. Moreover, if people stopped having children voluntarily, it could be legitimate for states to incentivize and maybe even coerce individuals to bear and rear children. Various arguments against the enforceability of an individual duty to bear and rear children are examined. Coercing people to have children would come at significant moral cost; however, none of the arguments against enforceability seem decisive. The existence of a collective responsibility to have children bears on the question of whether parents and non-parents ought to shoulder the costs of childbearing and child rearing together.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Children as negative externalities?Serena Olsaretti - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (2):152-173.
A Duty to Adopt?Daniel Friedrich - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-08

Downloads
791 (#29,567)

6 months
164 (#22,646)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anca Gheaus
Central European University

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Procreation and Adoption.Tina Rulli - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (6):305-315.
What You're Rejecting When You're Expecting.Blake Hereth - 2023 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (3):1-12.
What Is the Question to which Anti-Natalism Is the Answer?Nicholas Smyth - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (1):1-17.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Presumptive benefit, fairness, and political obligation.George Klosko - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):241-259.
Environmentalism, procreation, and the principle of fairness.Paula Casal - 1999 - Public Affairs Quarterly 13 (4):363-376.

Add more references