Coke is It! Reply to Diamond

Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (1-2):78-81 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Tom Gieryn.Paul R. Gross - 1996 - Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (1):116-120.
Reply to Richard Hull.Wiebe E. Bijker - 1994 - Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (2):245-246.
Reply to Mark Elam.Langdon Winner - 1994 - Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (1):107-109.
Reply to the Letter to the Editor.Michael Shermer - 1993 - Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (4):539-540.
What's at Stake in the Sociology of Technology? A Reply to Pinch and to Winner.Steve Woolgar - 1993 - Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (4):523-529.
Reply to Woolgar and Grint: A Preview. [REVIEW]Rob Kling - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (3):379-381.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
12 (#1,377,042)

6 months
7 (#730,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The economics of science.Arthur M. Diamond - 1996 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 9 (2):6-49.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references