- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Euthanasia, withholding life-prolonging treatment, and moral differences between killing and letting die
Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):115-117 (1988)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-prolonging Medical Treatment: Guidance for Decision Making.British Medical Association - 1999 - Wiley-Blackwell.
The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia.H. V. McLachlan - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):636-638.
Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatment--moral implications of a thought experiment.R. Gillon - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):203-222.
Killing and letting die: an irrelevant distinction to bioethics.Mohammad Manzoor Malik - 2011 - Journal of Islam in Asia (4):383-396.
Killing and Letting Die.Alastair Norcross - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 451–463.
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Relevance of the Killing Versus Letting Die Distinction.Robert D. Truog & Andrew McGee - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):34-36.
The moral distinction between killing and letting die in medical cases.Joachim Asscher - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):278–285.
Euthanasia and End-of-Life Decisions: From the Empirical Turn to Moral Intuitionism.Marta Spranzi - 2024 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 67 (1):73-87.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-13
Downloads
55 (#391,995)
6 months
9 (#482,469)
2010-09-13
Downloads
55 (#391,995)
6 months
9 (#482,469)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates: legislation and official guidelines across Europe.H. E. McHaffie, M. Cuttini, G. Brolz-Voit, L. Randag, R. Mousty, A. M. Duguet, B. Wennergren & P. Benciolini - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):440-446.
Management of death, dying and euthanasia: attitudes and practices of medical practitioners in South Australia.C. A. Stevens & R. Hassan - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):41-46.
Palliative care ethics: non-provision of artificial nutrition and hydration to terminally ill sedated patients.R. Gillon - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):131-187.
Moral intuition, good deaths and ordinary medical practitioners.M. Parker - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):28-34.
References found in this work
The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.Philippa Foot - 1967 - Oxford Review 5:5-15.
Raping and making love are different concepts: so are killing and voluntary euthanasia.J. Davies - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):148-149.
Kuhse, Singer and slippery slopes.G. J. Fairbairn - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):132-147.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2