Can an Indeterministic Cause Leave a Choice Up to the Agent?

In David Palmer (ed.), Libertarian Free Will: Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 14-26 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues for a noncausal libertarian account of free will. According to this account, a person’s free actions cannot be caused at all. The chapter compares its libertarian view to Kane’s event-causal libertarian view. It critiques Kane’s proposals concerning self-forming actions and indeterministic causation. The chapter explains why it thinks that its non-causal view is to be preferred over Kane’s event-causal view. The chapter also discusses the luck objection to libertarianism. The chapter isolates what he believes is the intuition that the luck argument gives rise to. Finally, the chapter considers the strength of our reasons for believing that uncaused actions might be found in the natural order.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carl Ginet
Cornell University

Citations of this work

Free will and control: a noncausal approach.David Palmer - 2021 - Synthese 198 (10):10043-10062.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references